4b - SIGs

How does your SIG compare to other groups or communities that you are a part of in the workplace?
How will you use your SIG?
How will you evidence the shared practice within your own professional inquiry process?

I've been fortunate enough to join Special Interest Group "Performing Arts in Education" which Emma Corboz has set up. There is a few of us in the group posting different links and sites of interest around the arts in education which is really helpful.

I think this SIG will really help towards my Inquiry as people are posting links I have not seen, and posting things I would not have thought would be beneficial, but when looking into them further they really are.

I have been reading through Teaching Dance as Art in Education by Brenda Pugh McCutchen and it is very helpful aiding my line of inquiry.

Something that really interested me when reading this was How ED (Educational dance) differs from a Physical Education Model.

She states "Aspects of dance are easily adapted to physical education. Indeed physical educators historically brough dance into the curriculum and make a place  for it longer before there were dance specialists in K-12. Dabce training for certified physical educators is usually activity based. Rarely do physical educators study dance performance. Choreography, criticism and dance history. Their dance goals relate to fitness, skill development and recreation, rhythmic activity, locomotor skills and sequences.
Dance can be taught in both ED and physical education with the highest integrity. Both the physical educator and dance specialist bring specific skills and backgrounds to dance, and both ably teach dance to achieve their goals and standards."

My inquiry is forever adapting, which is great as it shows my research is progressing.

Originally I had quite a one sided view.
I was unhappy that the arts were being taught as part of the PE Curriculum for Dance or English Curriculum for Drama and didn't understand why.
Now, because of skyping with Adesola, through to reading this book, along with conversations with a good friend who is a Drama teacher, I am now not exploring why the Arts is being taught by teachers from those academic areas, because like the above states, these teachers still have their own standards and achievements, but, why is the arts is not more specialised in schools?
The arts seems to have a stigma attached to it. For example, people do Dance or Drama if they are not succeeding in other subjects. Like it is an easier grade to achieve.

What I have found interesting when talking to my friend Jessica, who is a head of Drama at a secondary school is that she is very much agreeing that the arts are deemed less valuable yet she signposted me to a link: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/creative-industries-worth-8million-an-hour-to-uk-economy which shows the arts industry make such a large revenue. She is now interested in my inquiry as well. What is beneficial is that she is that whilst she is a drama teacher with no "professional" performing experience, she went to university, obtained a degree, then PGCE and from there now teaches. She is valuable to my discussion as she is educated in a different way to me and everyone in the SIG I am within.

Because of this article and reading other peoples opinions in SIG "Performing Arts in Education" I have changed my inquiry to:
"How can the arts become more a more reputable subject in schools"

With my award title sticking at  "BA Hons Professional Practice in Performing Arts and Education"





Reference:

B Pugh McCutchen (2006) Teaching Dance as Art in Education: How ED (Educational dance) differs from a Physical Education Model.